پیش‌بینی ارتباط با مدرسه بر اساس دلبستگی به والدین و همسالان

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین رابطه و پیش‌بینی ارتباط با مدرسه از طریق دلبستگی به والدین و همسالان در نوجوانان بود. بر همین اساس 378 دانش‌آموز پسر پایه دوم دبیرستان از طریق نمونه-گیری خوشه‌ای از میان دبیرستان‌های شهر تهران انتخاب شدند و به پرسشنامه‌‌‌ای متشکل از سیاهه دلبستگی به والدین و همسالان (IPPA) و مقیاس ارتباط با مدرسه (SCS) پاسخ دادند.نتایج حاصل از رگرسیون گام به گام نشان داد که دلبستگی به والدین و همسالان توان پیش‌بینی ارتباط با مدرسه را دارد. از میان مؤلفه های دلبستگی؛ مؤلفه ارتباط با همسالان و ارتباط با والدین به ترتیب بیشترین قدرت پیش‌بینی-کنندگی ارتباط با مدرسه را دارند. مؤلفه بیگانگی باهمسالان و والدین به‌طور منفی با ارتباط با مدرسه رابطه دارند. براساس نتایج می‌توان گفت که دلبستگی ایمن به والدین و همسالان می‌تواند به‌عنوان عاملی برای پیوند با مدرسه در نظر گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Predicting School Connectedness Based on Parent and Peers Attachment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elahe Hejazi
  • Javad EJei
  • Ghafar Ranjbar
Tehran University
چکیده [English]

The purpose of present study was investigated the relationship and predictability of school connectedness through parent and peers attachment in adolescence. For this reason, 387 male students of second grade of high school were chosen through cluster sampling method and completed a survey consisted of Parent Peers Attachment Inventory (IPPA) and School connection Scale (SCS). The results of stepwise regression show predicting of school connectedness based on parent and peers attachment. Among attachment subscales, communication whit peers and parent have the most power to predict school connectedness. The relationship between Peers alienation and parent alienation with school connectedness is significantly negative.In general, secure attachment to parent and peers could be considered as a factor for school connectedness.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Parent Attachment- Peers Attachment- School Connectedness

مراجع

  1. اژه‌ای ، ج.، غلامعلی‌لواسانی، م.، مال‌احمدی، ا.، و خضری‌آذر، ه. (1390). الگوی علّی روابط بین سبک‌های فرزندپروری ادراک شده، اهداف پیشرفت، خودکارآمدی و موفقیت تحصیلی. مجله روان‌شناسی، 15(3)، 301-284.
  2. تقی‌یاره، ف.، مظاهری، م. ع.، و آزادفلاح، پ. (1384). بررسی ارتباط سطح تحول من، دلبستگی به خدا و جهت‌گیری مذهبی در دانشجویان. مجله روان‌شناسی، 9(1)، 21 -3.
  3. دانشیان، م. (1378). رابطۀ دلبستگی به والدین و همسالان با شیوه‌های مقابله با فشار روانی و عزت‌نفس دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه سوم راهنمایی و سوم دبیرستان. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
  4. نگهبان سلامی، م. (1384). بررسی رابطه سبک‌های دلبستگی به والدین و همسالان با سبک‌های هویت. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
  5. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1987). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. NJ: Hillsdale.
  6. Allen, J. P., & Land, D.(1999). Attachment in adolescence. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory and research(pp. 319-335). New York: Guilford.
  7. Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-455.
  8. Barber, B. k, & Schlaterman, J. M. (2008). Connectedness in the lives of children and adolescents: A call for grater conceptual clarity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(3), 209- 216.
  9. Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbot, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 568- 582.
  10. Battistich, V., & Hom, A. (1997). The Relationship between students’ sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1997-2001.
  11. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schnaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motive and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627-658.
  12. Blum, R. W.(2005). A case for school connectedness. Educational Leadership, 62(7), 16-20.
  13. Blum, R. W., & Libbey, H. P. (2004). Executive Summary. Journal of School Health, 74, 231-232
  14. Blum, R. W., McNeely, C., & Rinehart, P. M. (2002). Improving the odds: The untapped power of schools to improve the health of teens. Minneapolis: Center for Adolescent Health and Development, University of Minnesota. Available: http://www.casciac.org.
  15. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969).
  16. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain, & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children.2nd (pp. 37-43), NY: Freeman.
  17. Brown, R., & Evans, W. P. (2002). Extracurricular activity and ethnicity: Creating greater school connection among diverse student populations. Urban Education, 37(1), 41-58.
  18. Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103(4), 548–581.
  19. Dixon, J. A. (2007). Predicting student perceptions of school connectedness: The contributions of parent attachment and peer attachment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami, Miami .Available: http://: www.proquest.com
  20. Dornbusch, S. M., Erickson, K. G., Laird, J., & Wong, C. A. (2001). The relation of family and school attachment to adolescent deviance in diverse groups and communities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 396-422.
  21. Eccles, J. S., Early, D., Fraiser, K., Belansky, E., & McCarthy, K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 263-286.
  22. Engles, R., C., M., E., Finkenauer, C., Meeus, W., & Dekovic, M. (2001). Parental attachment and adolescents’ emotional adjustment: The associations with social skills and relational competence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 428-439.
  23. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
  24. Furlong, M. J., Whipple, A. D., Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S.(2003). Multiple contexts of social engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. California School Psychologist, 8, 99–113.
  25. Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., Scheier, L. M., Doyle, M. M., & Williams, C. (2002). Common predictors of cigarette smoking, alcohol use, aggression, and delinquency among inner city minority youth. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1141-1148.
  26. Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Hil, K. G., Battin-Pearson, S., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle Social Development Intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 225-236.
  27. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  28. Jenkins, P. (1997). School delinquency and the school social bond. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 337-367.
  29. McNeely, C., & Falci, C. (2004). School connectedness and the transition into and out of health risk behaviors among adolescents: A comparison of social belonging and Teacher Support. Journal of School Health, 74, 284-292.
  30. Millings, A., Buck, R., Montgomery, A., Spears, M., & Stallard, P. (2012). School connectedness, peer attachment, and self-esteem as predictors of adolescent depression, Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1061-1067.
  31. O’Brennan, L. N., & Furlong, M. J. (2010). Relations between students' perceptions of school connectedness and peer victimization. Journal of School Violence, 9, 375-391.
  32. Pellegrini, A., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 699–725.
  33. Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. M., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., Tabor, J., Beuhring, T.,Seiving,R.E., Shew,M., Ireland,M.,Bearinger,L.,Udry, J.H. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823-833..
  34. Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (1998). Low social support among at risk adolescents. Social Work in Education, 20, 245-260.
  35. Shochet, I. M., Smyth, T., & Homel, R. (2007). The impact of parental attachment on adolescent perception of the school environment and school connectedness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 28 (2), 109-118
  36. Thompson, D. R., Lachan, R., Overpeck, M., Ross, J. G., & Gross, L. A. (2006). School connectedness in the health behavior in school-aged children study: The role of student, school, and school neighborhood characteristics. Journal of School Health, 76, 379-386.
  37. Waters, S. K., Cross, O. S., & Runions, K. (2009). Social and ecological structures supporting adolescent connectedness to school: A theoretical model. Journal of School Health, 79, 516- 524
  38. Whitlock, J. L. (2003). Voice, visibility, place and power: Correlates of school and community connectedness among 8th, 10th, and 12th grade youth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  39. Wilkinson-Lee, A. M., Zhang, Q., Nuno, V. L., & Wilhelm, M. S. (2011). Adolescent emotional distress: The role of family obligations and school connectedness. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 221–230.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار