نقد بخشودگی خیانت زناشویی از منظر فلسفه "هم سخنی" مارتین بوبر

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

از منظر فلسفه هم سخنی بوبر، تعامل فرد با زوج شرکت کننده در خیانت زناشویی تنها می تواند در یک تعامل «من-آن»ی (یک تعامل مونولوگ) یا یک تعامل «من-تو»یی (یک تعامل دیالوگ) باشد. در تعامل اول فرد، همسر خود را به صورت سابجکتیو درک کرده و وی را بر مبنای اطلاعات گذشته اش با جز محدودی از وجود خود، بخش محدودی از وجود وی را تجربه می کند. در تعامل «من-تو»یی فرد همسر آسیب رسان خود را به صورت اینترسابجکتیویته، با تمامی وجود خود، تمامی وجود وی را به صورت یک وحدت یکپارچه و در زمان حال به جای تجربه کردن، در قلمروی «میان» قرار می دهد و وی را در یک ارتباط هم سخنی به جای یک ارتباط یک طرفه درک می کند. در این مقاله پس از نقد مفهوم بخشودگی خیانت، ارتباط در قلمروی میان «من-تو» به عنوان معنای اصیل بخشودگی مورد بحث قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Criticizing the marital infidelity forgiveness from the perspective of Martin Buber's Dialogical Philosophy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahmoud Khazaei
  • Shahriyar Shahidi
  • Fereshteh Mootabi
  • Mohammad Ali Mazaheri
  • leyli Panaghi
Shahid Beheshti university
چکیده [English]

From the perspective of the Martin Buber's dialogical philosophy, a person interaction with a married couples can only be in an I- IT Communication (a monologue Communication) or an "I-Thou" interaction (a dialogue Communication). In the first Communication, the individual perceives his wife subjectively and experiences a limited part of his existence, based on his past information, with only a limited amount of his existence. The betrayed spouse understands his/her offender spouse as an intersubjectivity and wholeheartedly in I and thou communication. he/she puts his/her partner's whole essence as an integrated unity in the present time instead of experiencing it; in a 'between' realm And understands him/her in a Dialogical communication rather than a monologue one. In this paper, the relationship in the realm between the “I and thou” as the true meaning of forgiveness is discussed following criticizing the concept of the forgiveness of betrayal.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dialogical philosophy
  • intersubjectivity
  • Relationship
  • Between ،Marital infidelity

مراجع

  1. سیف، س. م. (1385). تاملی در فلسفه هم سخنی مارتین بوبر. فصل نامه نامه فلسفی دوره 12 , شماره 56؛ 43-58.
  2. گاراراد، ا.، و مک ناتون، د. (1392). بخشودن (هنر زیستن). ترجمه خشایار دیهیمی. تهران. انتشارات گمان.
  3. بوبر، م. (1390). من و تو. ترجمه خسرو ریگی. شیراز. انتشارات نوید شیراز.
  4. Abrahms-Spring, J., & Spring, M. (1996). After the affair.
  5. Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Understanding infidelity: correlates in a national random sample. Journal of family psychology, 15(4), 735. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.735
  6. Beach, S. R., Jouriles, E. N., & O'leary, K. D. (1985). Extramarital sex: Impact on depression and commitment in couples seeking marital therapy. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 11(2), 99-108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00926238508406075
  7. Berry, J. W., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2001). Forgivingness, relationship quality, stress while imagining relationship events, and physical and mental health. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 447–455. doi:10.1037/00220167.48.4.447
  8. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (Ronald Gregor Smith, Trans.). New York: Scribner.
  9. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1970), 57.
  10. Buber, M., & Smith, R. G. (1947). Between Man and Man; Translated by Ronald Gregor Smith. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  11. Cano, A., & O'leary, K. D. (2000). Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68(5), 774. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.774
  12. Case, B. (2005) Healing the wounds of infidelity through the healing power of apology and forgiveness. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 4: 41– 54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J398v04n02_05
  13. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9, 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00016
  14. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2007). Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well-established relationships? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701552360
  15. Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H. and Beach, S. R. (2005) ‘’til lack of forgiveness doth us part’: forgiveness and marriage. In E. L. Worthington (ed.) Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 207–225). New York: Routledge
  16. Fitness, J., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1993). Love, hate, anger, and jealousy in close relationships: A prototype and cognitive appraisal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 942-958.
  17. Garrard, E., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Forgiveness. Routledge.
  18. Gordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2004) An integrative intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30: 213–231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01235.x
  19. Johnson, S. M. (2005). Broken bonds: An emotionally focused approach to infidelity. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 4(2-3), 17-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J398v04n02_03
  20. Johnson, S. M., Makinen, J. A., & Millikin, J. W. (2001). Attachment injuries in couple relationships: A new perspective on impasses in couples therapy. Journal of marital and family therapy, 27(2), 145-155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb01152.x
  21. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
  22. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321
  23. McNulty, J. K. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 787-790. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0021678
  24. McNulty, J. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770-783. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167211407077
  25. McNulty, J. K. (2013). Personality and relationships. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 535-552). New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2016). Forgive and forget, or forgive and regret? Whether forgiveness leads to less or more offending depends on offender agreeableness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 616-631. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167216637841
  27. Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620-639.
  28. Paton, H. J. (1955). The Modern Predicament. By G. Watts Cunningham.
  29. Peluso, P. R. (Ed.). (2007). Infidelity: A practitioner’s guide to working with couples in crisis. Routledge.
  30. Reibstein, J., & Richards, M. (1992). Sexual arrangements: Marriage and affairs. Vintage.
  31. Resick, P. A., & Calhoun, K. S. (2001). Posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual, 3, 60-113.
  32. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  33. Spring, J.A. (1996). After the affair: Healing the pain and rebuilding the trust when a partner has been unfaithful. New York: HarperCollins
  34. Theunissen, M. (1984). The other: Studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and Buber.
  35. Trüb, H. (1991). In Friedman, M. S. (1991).The Worlds of Existentialism: A Critical Reader. Ed. with Introductions and Conclusion and an extended updating Preface by Maurice Friedman. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, pp. 497–505.
  36. Tsang, J., McCullough, M. E., & Fincham, F. D. (2006). The longitudinal association between forgiveness and relationship closeness and commitment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 448-472. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.4.448
  37. Wallace, H. M., Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness: Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.012
  38. Winek, J. L., & Craven, P. A. (2003). Healing rituals for couples recovering from adultery. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(3), 249-266. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024518719817
  39. Witvliet, C. V., Ludwig, T., & Vander Laan, K. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 12, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9280.00320

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار